You can ignore authors, whether they are producing too much noise or being needlessly provocative, by clicking the yellow unhappy when reading their post.
- Manlobbi
Investment Strategies / Non-US Stocks
No. of Recommendations: 0
No. of Recommendations: 6
You keep posting links to your Yahoo email.
No. of Recommendations: 0
No. of Recommendations: 19
One bit:
"Security costs can range widely. Mark Zuckerberg’s personal security cost $23.4 million in 2023 according to Meta’s proxy statement. In contrast, Berkshire Hathaway spent just $413,595 on Warren Buffett’s personal security in 2023. Since both men are equally well-known and recognizable, it is not clear why Mr. Zuckerberg’s security cost so much more, but it is undeniable that both men require personal security outside of the office. The question is how much is needed."
The distinction seems rational. A lot more people hate Mr Z : )
Jim
No. of Recommendations: 0
" You keep posting links to your Yahoo email."
Thanks, I don't think I can delete the post tho?
No. of Recommendations: 6
Maybe not. But you can stop posting links to your Yahoo email. :-)
No. of Recommendations: 3
I'm in. As in, happy to pay my few cents' share of Mr Buffett's personal security. Heck, I'd even go a dollar.
-- sutton
whose rural household security is largely provided by Mrs sutton's aging, flatulent 185 lb English mastiff (who tends to crawl into my side of the bed on cold winter nights when I get up to answer a call of nature.) All-in, maybe $10/day
No. of Recommendations: 6
... security is largely provided by Mrs sutton's aging, flatulent ... mastiff...
Gives whole new meaning to "lethal response" security systems.
Jim
No. of Recommendations: 3
When a security bill is high, like Zuckerberg’s 23m, it usually includes that the company requires him to use private company aircraft for non business trips
