Post #40148 by wzambon on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (105)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 10

The deal is the guarantee.

Not even close. Putin would roll right over that economic agreement and Trump would write off whatever investment in infrastructure was made as a loss.

So at this point, a US involvement in a peace deal is off the table; Trump blew it up ow the center of gravity in this matter has shifted from Washington to Europe.

As for NATO troops stationed, several NATO countries have already volunteered to send troops as guarantors of whatever agreement is signed.

And they, rather than you or I, would be better positioned to write their own rules of engagement.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (105)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.