Post #10675 by albaby1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 3

And forget 'irrefutable'. How about overwhelming?

Again, the evidence is only that there were too few instances of specific types of ballot fraud (false voters, people voting twice, etc.) to possibly affect the outcome of the election. But the GOP base labels many other aspects of the 2020 election as fraudulent, primarily changes to the rules under which the elections were conducted. Their counterfactual belief is that had the Democrats not changed the rules in order to address COVID, Trump would have won handily. That can't be proven or disproven, so there's no real evidence (overwhelming or otherwise) to really refute that.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.