Post #49877 by g0177325 on the US Policy board

When reading a post with a keyboard, you can type the keys , and . to move backwards and forward between posts! You can also press 'return' to read through posts one at a time. There's freedom in Shrewd'm!

- Manlobbi

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2)

Prev | Next

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

So, Bondi has asked the court to release "all relevant" grand jury evidence related to the indictment of Jeffrey Epstein (and maybe Ghislaine Maxwell?). The court may or may not allow some of all of that evidence to be released.

We all know this is but a drop in the bucket of all the evidence there is that the FBI/DOJ might have. But what about all the other evidence? Can Bondi direct that all that be released now independently of any court verdict on the grand jury evidence (with redactions to protect victims)?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.