Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7) |
Author: Goofyhoofy ✸✹🐝🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 4582 
Subject: Re: WMT vs AMZN, groceries and e-commerce
Date: 06/08/24 8:14 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
Amazon is also losing me with all of the 3rd party items it sells and how it keep pushing items at the top of the page due to sponsorships, etc.

Sadly, it seems every merchant is eventually led to this kind of abuse. A search on Google is now littered with ads, line after line after line. Sometimes it’s hard to find what you’re looking for through all the ads.

Amazon pushes sponsored crap to the top of the searches there.

WalMart puts sponsored items at eye level, although you don’t understand that as easily as the online “pushes”, but it’s common in the supermarket industry; stores are paid to give “prime space” (eye level shelfs and end caps) for payment to move product. For slightly less payment they will move a favorite product away - or out - in favor of someone who will pay for the shelf space (it’s called “slotting allowances”) and manufacturers pay the bribe to get into the stores.

My brother, who was in the grocery store set-up business, spent his entire life juggling manufacturer demands and bribes with the realities of trying to have the products people actually want on the shelves. There’s a funny side-phenomenon to this push to introduce new products, called “the sophomore slump”. It’s when the incentives go away, the sales people aren’t getting pep talked, and some other manufacturer pays to have *their* new product on the shelves - which is why 90% of new products fail within two years.

Got carried away there, sorry. Anyway, yeah. Everybody crapifies eventually.

And don’t get me started on Facebook.

Goofy: won’t use “you shop for me” services because I like to choose my own bananas, etc.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Goofyhoofy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,576 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community