Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |
Post New
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 55847 
Subject: The bullets follow the bullhorn
Date: 07/10/2025 10:49 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/07/t...

It was here, just south of Fort Worth, that ten heavily armed left-wing militants launched a highly coordinated attack on law enforcement outside the Prairieland ICE Detention Center.
...
These are the inevitable consequences of a political movement that has spent the better part of a decade demonizing the very people sworn to enforce our immigration laws.

What was once violence on the fringe of political debate has been normalized by one of America's two main political parties.


Key word: Normalized. The problem is, this isn't new for them.

Is there a greater danger to a constitutional republic than an armed phalanx of nihilists, activated by the words of the leaders of the minority party, attempting to maim and kill government officials?

For all their sanctimony about “protecting democracy” and “upholding the rule of law,” today’s Democrats have built a movement that selectively nullifies both. When they’re in power, they ignore the law, declining to enforce statutes they dislike, gutting immigration courts, and instructing executive agencies to slow-walk deportations.

When out of power, they attempt to nullify the exercise of executive power through venue shopping, nationwide injunctions, institutional sabotage, and now, through ideological violence.

It’s the same pattern every time:

If voters elect someone they oppose, they launch impeachment proceedings or shop for a judge to block authority.

If ICE agents do their jobs, they are branded as racists.

If a president uses Article II powers to enforce the border, they call it fascism.

It’s nullification by any means necessary—ballots, bench, or bullets. The difference between the Democrat party and the Jacobins is increasingly that of wardrobe and weaponry.

The Democrats have spent years stoking this fire. They wrap their bombast in the language of compassion—but it’s calculated sabotage, and they know it.
Print the post


Author: Lambo 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 55847 
Subject: Re: The bullets follow the bullhorn
Date: 07/10/2025 11:28 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 8
Y'all are much more violent than we are, stats prove it. You can claim you're as violent as Islamic Jihadists on your home turf - MAGA be proud!


Executive Summary

*Right-wing extremist terror incidents in the U.S. have been increasing since the mid-2000s, but the past six years have seen their sharpest rise
yet. There were just seven right-wing terror incidents in the period 2005-2007, but by 2017-2019 there were 27, which increased to 40 in
2020-2022.
*The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) Center on Extremism (COE) has documented 67 domestic terror incidents by right-wing extremists in the United
States from 2017 to 2022. These include successful terrorist attacks, failed terrorist attacks and foiled terrorist plots.
*White supremacists were responsible for more attacks than any other type of right-wing extremist in the past six years (30 of 67, or 45%), but
anti-government extremists, anti-abortion extremists and other types of right-wing extremists have also plotted and carried out attacks.
*Right-wing terror attacks during this period also resulted in more deaths (58) from such attacks than any of the previous six-year periods since
the time of the Oklahoma City bombing. All but five of those deaths occurred in white supremacist attacks—primarily mass shootings directed
against minority targets.
*Most incidents (72%) involved only a single perpetrator, whether an arsonist targeting an abortion clinic or a white supremacist shooter targeting
a synagogue. Single perpetrators were also far more likely to successfully carry out attacks; plots with multiple perpetrators were usually
stopped by law enforcement. Most incidents were not committed by organized extremist groups.
*Firearms were the most popular weapon chosen for attacks (27 of 67 incidents, or 40%, not counting two additional incidents where firearms were
one of two weapon types). Incendiary devices (featured in 25% of incidents) were also popular, followed by explosive devices (18%).
*Right-wing terrorists considered a wide array of targets. Government targets were most frequently chosen by perpetrators (in 18 of 67, or 27% of
incidents), closely followed by targets based on actual or perceived religion (17 of 67, or 25%), which consisted of Muslims and Jews. Abortion-
related targets and targets based on race (primarily Black people) were also common, at nine and eight, respectively (13% and 12%).

https://www.adl.org/resources/report/right-wing-ex...

. Across both datasets, we find that radical acts perpetrated by individuals associated with left-wing causes are less likely to be violent. In the United States, we find no difference between the level of violence perpetrated by right-wing and Islamist extremists. However, differences in violence emerge on the global level, with Islamist extremists being more likely than right-wing extremists to engage in more violent act

https://www.start.umd.edu/publication/comparison-p...

Print the post


Author: wzambon 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 55847 
Subject: Re: The bullets follow the bullhorn
Date: 07/10/2025 11:34 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
What your report calls “right wing terrorism”, MAGA calls “target practice”. Therefore, your report is bogus.
Print the post


Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 55847 
Subject: Re: The bullets follow the bullhorn
Date: 07/10/2025 11:39 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
Y'all are much more violent than we are,

Stats prove that people who preface posts with "y'all" are a) not from below the Mason-Dixon line and b) about to say something that makes them feel better (as opposed to saying actual facts or something relevant to the thread).

democrats are out there calling anyone not in their (shrinking) camp a bunch of GestapoNaziHitlers and left wing nutjobs are out dutifully acting on those dog whistles. It's happening, and every democrat that doesn't say something about what's happening in their name is complicit in it.

Don't like it? Stop calling for violence.
Print the post


Author: ges 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 55847 
Subject: Re: The bullets follow the bullhorn
Date: 07/10/2025 8:06 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
<i.Y'all are much more violent than we are, stats prove it. You can claim you're as violent as Islamic Jihadists on your home turf - MAGA be proud!


Proven false. Sheesh.
Print the post


Post New
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds