Post #682 by onepoorguy on the Atheist Shrewds board

Halls of Shrewd'm / Atheist Shrewds

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 5

You're attacking me personally for suggesting an article about a legitimate long haul serious physicist who's challenging your commonly held beliefs.

Nope. I never do that. I did attack the science writer for his sloppiness, and explicitly exonerated you. You were just quoting him.

I did not read every word, no. I read enough to know the science writer for that publication was sloppy, and therefore suspect. He didn't get everything wrong. In fact, he got a lot correct. It's quite possible he didn't understand the scientist (and science) he was trying to report on. Wouldn't be the first time that has happened in lay-media. I don't trust that he really understood Zurek's paper(s), and he didn't link to them that I could see.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8)

Prev | Next

Announcements

Atheist Shrewds FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.