Post #21925 by PhoolishPhilip on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (49)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

Sotomayor and Jackson in their dissents basically explained why. POTUS officially overseas the military. If he gave them an order, that's (by the SCOTUS) an official part of his job. Therefore, all information surrounding that action would be subject to immunity. So you couldn't even investigate that it was a misuse of his power.

Biden would never do that. I wouldn't put it past convict Trump.

Biden SHOULD do that to test the court. Trump potentially committed treason by acting to prevent the peaceful transfer of power. The court has given him immunity from prosecution for treasonous acts. The only way to defend the constitution is for Biden to issue an order for the military to arrest Trump and hold him in Guantanamo indefinitely. There would be no legal recourse, according to the Trump ruling, against such a patriotic abuse of power.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (49)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.