Subject: Re: The Affordability Tour Kicks Off

I'm saying that many millions of people have stable, decent-paying, often middle-class jobs working in the health care sector.

In 1990, Tandy Corp, parent of Radio Shack, had some 44,000 employees. Were those people so "entitled" to their jobs that they should be taxpayer subsidized?

In 1978, Ford Motor employed 256,614 in the US. By 2014, that number had dwindled to 90,000, US and Canada combined. Were those other 166,000 entitled to be paid, forever, even though the company had no use for them?

Tens of thousands of Proles are kicked to the curb by their employers, because continuing their employment is not economic. Why should people working in health care be different?

Steve