Subject: Re: Iran - The Difference in Assessment
Who knows; it depends on how it played out.

But sitting there and pretending that Iran was somehow going to turn into a country that follows the Rules based international order is beyond folly.

How is it beyond folly if there wasn't an alternative? In other words, if you don't think Obama should have invaded and wouldn't have supported it, then what was the solution that would have been self-evidently better than trying to reduce the threat through diplomacy?