Subject: Re: Hunter pleas
then the supporting evidence becomes integral.

Is it necessary to go through each individual porn site and hooker transaction, when the defendant has basically stipulated the expenses were personal by correcting the returns?

Or do you just want to hear them read aloud in court? Maybe for the public shaming? Should we force Hunter to wear a scarlet “A” on his shirts so everyone will know that he spent time with hookers?

Or do you just want to hear the names of the web sites because you’re looking for some new porn sites and hookers? For research purposes, of course.

—Peter