Subject: Re: Speaking of the Confederacy
LM: The land isn't tainted, the statue is.

What makes you think that?

I'm asking you to support why you think the land is tainted just because it was once owned by Lee. I don't see your logic.

The statue however has images that invoke benevolent slavery, and possibly other Lost Cause themes - so it's tainted. But please explain why you think the property needs cleansing simply because it was owned by Lee.