Subject: Re: And right on cue - NY motion
In theory, this ruling has zero bearing on the New York state conviction regarding election fraud since that case involves actions of a person who had not become President at the time of those crimes. Hopefully we can all agree the USSC did not provide immunity to presidents for any prior conduct performed PRIOR to becoming President.

However, we are so far throughthe looking glass, words have no meaning anymore. Certainly any of the words read by a majority of the Supreme Court. Words mean whatever the hell they want them to mean at exactly one point in time. They are no longer bound by logic, morals or precedent.


WTH