Subject: Re: NYT: Biden Border Disaster
It is a stupid policy, but that doesn't mean it isn't deliberate. I'm not sure when the left decided that a conspiracy theory is an epithet that automatically self-falsifies.

"Conspiracy theory" doesn't mean "false theory of more than one person acting in concert to achieve an objective."

But that's what progressives and the MSM decided it should mean for propagandistic reasons.

Example: When 51 intelligence officials, prompted by a Biden crony Jake Sullivan, all agree to sign a disinformation letter asserting that the candidates sons laptop, with material embarrassing to Biden, is Russian disinformation shortly before a national election, that's a "conspiracy." It doesn't mean the conspiracy didn't happen to call what I just said a "conspiracy theory." Because it did happen.

Try again. Use logic. How is flying hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens to the interior of the country, after a presidential declaration that it's ok tondo so, even in violation of existing law, simply by an executive order fabricating a parole program, not a deliberate act? Doesn't mean it was legal or illegal that's up to the courts. It was deliberate. Why do you think so many Somalis ended up in Minnesota? That's just one example.

Rven if you think it was initially due to stupidity, what you really mean is negligence. That's the best spin you can put on the Biden policies

But when you keep engaging in negligent conduct over and over and over, at some point it becomes recklessness, and then failure to stop doing what you've been doing is deliberate. Like a drunk who knows he always gets drunk if he goes into the bar and never stops going into the bar in Friday nights.

By saying it's just stupidity you attempt to remove moral and ethical responsibility from the elect d officials and bureaucrats who are responsible.

But if there's any doubt why was the so called compromise bill that Biden proposed inclusive if a provision allowing at least 5000 additional illegal aliens into the country per day???

In terms of what the objective was, what is your reason for doubting the motivation behind it? If you were correct, then why are Democrats universally against NOT counting illegal aliens in the Census for purposes of apportioning Congressional seats?

After all, they don't vote, right?

Right?