Subject: Re: Timing: recent highs
Jim, IIRC in post #262358 on the old MI Board, you mentioned that perhaps 114 days was a slightly better indicator than 99 days. 99 days had the momentum and we are likely splitting hairs so that's the indicator the Board stuck with.

Given data has continued to fill in since then, do you think 99, 114, or some other number is best? I would guess that any number roughly in this range is within the error bars, but thought I'd ask.

Thank you for any insight.

Chip