Subject: Re: Priorities
For the first time in FORTY YEARS, the Biden/HARRIS Administration is actually applying the right regulatory forces via the right tools to the "appropriate tools" in the economy that have made the economy so inequitable.

Sure. But that's a position. The Biden/Harris Administration has lots of positions. They've also done a ton of other things, from vastly increasing the amount of money for green initiatives, passing a massive child tax credit, various student loan forgiveness programs, fighting junk fees, increasing infrastructure spending, promoting "Made in America" rules, etc.

Nothing Harris is saying on the campaign trail gives the impression that this aspect of the administration's policies is the one that's super-important to her. Unlike social policy, where it is crystal clear that she views abortion rights and reproductive health as her top top priority. You can rattle off lots of stuff that the Administration is doing on competition/anti-trust matters, but it's not like Harris is communicating to anyone that this is her priority. Her stump speech (link below to one example) doesn't position any of those things as particularly important. In fact, she barely hits on it at all. I am pretty sure that there virtually no voters out there who believe that Harris' main priority is "trustbuster" as opposed to any other Democratic economic position:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/bri...

Again, you might like the Democrats' approach to anti-trust and business competition, and think Harris will follow in Biden's footsteps. But she's not selling that as a priority of her economic agenda.