Subject: Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?
What is not true that I have posted?

Well, since you asked, one reason is a lot of what's in that post is simply false.

For example, the first sentence ;you quoted is "EV’s will gradually replace oil use. If it were the case that 50% of all vehicles were EV’s, which is functionally impossible to achieve in the remote future, it would only reduce the world’s oil needs by about 10%. "

Motor vehicle fuel currently accounts for a hair under half of global crude oil use. Thus, a one half reduction would reduce global crude demand by about 24-25%, not by 10%. One could go on.

It's a post pushing a point of view and either selecting or making up "facts" to support that goal, not a conclusion drawn from a set of actual facts. Not many folks remember those, I suppose.

Jim