Subject: Re: Pfizer a permanent presence
I can't find in your post one single argument dealing with the pollution findings and the fact that Pfizer used for mass production of it's vaccine a different process than for the scientific study production. In case that's for you also "Gibberish" I suggest you read the official "Assessment Report" of the EMA (European Drug Agency) from 19.Sep 2021.

Anyway, as you say this:
I always strongly encourage vaccine skeptics to not take vaccines.
I understand that's irrelevant for you.

Putting a dismissing label ("vaccine skeptics", "climate skeptics", "xyz skeptics") on someone whose position is contrary to one's own is an ingenious way to avoid eventual cognitive dissonance when really dealing with it and, who knows, maybe finding out that it's not "gibberish".

Btw: This "vaccine skeptic" is vaccinated. 2 shots. Both mRNA vaccines. Comirnaty & Biontech.