Subject: Re: war with Denmark or Panama??
What is best for the USA is to put our own security interests at the top of the list. That does not justify any invasion or occupation on our part but does point out to interested parties there is a legitimate USA concern that must addressed in whatever outcome is negotiated.

Why must it be addressed?

If we're going to follow a policy of "America First," the corollary to that policy is that other nations will (and should) act similarly. So Greenland would pursue a "Greenland First" position, irrespective of whatever our security interests are. Why would we expect that negotiations among the interested parties must address the concerns of other nations, like the US?