Subject: Re: She Had No Face
True. Though it is only recently (since Heller) that the SCOTUS has interpreted the 2A as they have. Previously, it was much more "common sense" (like for the first 200 or so years of the country's existence). They have expanded the "right" considerably, and I believe to the point of absurdity. But we already had that discussion a while back, so I won't bore you with a rehash here.

That's the problem with making pronouncements not grounded in objective fact: someone can argue the opposite easily.

The Founders clearly stated in the 2A and in the Federalist papers what they meant. The courts have only now finally gotten it right.