Subject: Re: Our worst enemy
Dope1: A group of liberals hires another group of liberals to "fact check" things and lo and behold...they rate all the liberal sites as trustworthy.

Well, lessee. Here's what Media Bias Fact Check says about Rachel Maddow:

LEFT BIAS. These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

Overall, we rate Rachel Maddow Left Biased based on political positions that closely align with the progressive left. We also rate her Mixed for factual reporting due to the promotion of conspiracy theories and a few failed fact checks.

And here's how Media Bias Fact Check rate the National Review:

RIGHT BIAS. These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.

Overall, we rate the National Review Right Biased based on story selection that always favors the right and Mostly Factual in reporting due to a few misleading claims and occasional use of poor sources, and one failed fact check.

In short, it treats far left and far right the same: Maddow gets a "mixed" for 'factual' while the National Review gets a higher "mostly factual" because Maddow has failed a few fact checks and the Review just one.

So you don't know what you're talking about.

Again.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com...

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com...