Subject: Re: Meanwhile, in a New York Court Room
A Forbes writer reading the account of Weisselberg's testimony publicly stated Weisselberg was lying because the writer had email correspondence between Weisselberg and Forbes magazine that explicitly talked about upping the square footage of the Trump home and the fact that there was an email THREAD about it -- not just one note -- indicated it WAS something Weisselberg focused on for some ulterior motive.

This is surprising to me. Why would you risk perjury? What was the calculus there?