Subject: Re: Project 2025
Sorry, you're just plain wrong.

I think he has a point. The convict already has a record. Pummel him with that. Though I don't see the harm in mentioning P2025 in an off-hand way whenever appropriate. "Convict Trump wants to replace competent civil servants with sycophants and yes-men, just like outlined in P2025". That sort of thing.

We on the board are more sophisticated than most. Some of us are even "wonks" (not me, but a few posters seem to be). It would take a lot of time to educate the public on P2025. I agree that this would be a wasted effort. But mentioning it while attacking the convict on a policy point? I don't think that would be a waste of time. The media would then take care of explaining P2025 to curious viewers, and the Dems wouldn't have to waste their bandwidth on it.