Subject: Re: Long time reader, infrequent poster
https://gtr1.net/2013/?nas100....,... not good

I'm not a gtr expert, but this seems to be missing one step.

Try this: https://gtr1.net/2013/?s200301...

But still...not good.

CAGR 14.3%
vs. QQQ 15.5% & SPY 10.9% https://testfol.io/?s=dXFttiwt...

I don't get the logic of this screen.

I could understand the logic of omitting the 52 wk high. That would be "the stocks highest above their 52 wk low". CAGR 16.0%