Subject: Re: The 4% rule inventor makes some revisions
I have a real problem with so many sites that recommend various SWR approaches claiming (say) only 1% chance of failure. That's one person out of a hundred among the people who follow their advice ending up living in a cardboard box under a bridge.

It's worse than that - everyone starting this scheme at one of the "1%" times ends up living in a cardboard box under a bridge.

Well, kinda. In reality I expect most folks will trim spending in a very poor return scenario.

Anyone here retire in 2000? What did you do?