Subject: Re: The US 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS)
Don’t care. Facts are facts.

MBFC: original commentary is one‑sided and lightly sourced, while wire‑service pickups are reliable.

It's an opinion piece Dope! If you agree with an opinion it doesn't make it a fact. Opinion pieces aresubjective; they present an author's beliefs and interpretations . There is no sourcing of information because opinion pieces are subjective.

1. liberals wanted Net Zero and the piece outlined the reality of it. Fact

Me: NO. The piece outlined his opinion, which is subjective and can be disputed. Most of us are aware of and criticized the shut down of the nuclear plants, but that they didn't build the infrastructure to use their renewables well can be seen as overlooked in the opinion.


2. liberals do not look askance at open borders. Liberals resist any and all application of stricter borders or immigration enforcement.

HORSESHIT OF THE HIGHEST DEGREE! You've been following me. What are my positions?


3. The article cites several facts, all of which this rebuttal chooses to ignore.

In point one, you stated that this right wingers opinion about Net Zero is a fact, which means you have difficulty understanding what a fact is. In my opinion these Net Zero were never realistic targets or goals, the pledges unenforceable, and none of them included China, which was pumping coal emissions into the air at very large rates, etc. I've stated many times that we are going to conduct the great experiment and find out what man made climate change is like. Just my opinion - not a fact.