Subject: Re: GOP Primaries : Policy Debates Permanently Axed_QM
The point is that is has not and issuing a warning is simply a convenient way to attack a popular conservative. If such warnings were necessary and sincere, he would be issuing one for Chicago but he hasn't. Why?

I imagine it's because such warnings are issued more for the purpose of attacking conservative policies, not necessarily a conservative politician. The NAACP was incensed by the changes to Florida's educational policies, and the warning was a dramatic - though logically questionable - way of highlighting that opposition.