Subject: Re: Epstein - Trump is Trapped
If there "is something there" [against Trump, I presume you mean], and 24 women have testified under oath, presumably most of them are still alive and more than able, and very welcome, to go on the MSM and tell us exactly what Trump supposedly did.

Have any of these women done that?

No release of any files by Trump or Congress or the DOJ is necessary.

In fact a few of the victims have been making the MSM interview rounds advocating "release the files" but yet not actually saying what Trump supposedly did to them.

Why do you think that is?

It's because their attorneys would prefer all kinds of hearsay defamatory nonsense gets leaked by Congress so their clients can leverage those releases for large settlement against Trump (and anyone else mentioned as being "involved") but without risking an actual defamation lawsuit from the targeted individuals.

It's pretty obvious at this point that's what's going on--as well as people like Massie wanting derogatory information released in a manner which will not subject Massie to a defamation lawsuit, as Massie has clearly stated he believes some of his political adversaries or people funding those adversaries may be implicated.

Yup, spread 20 or 30 or 100,000 pages of slander through Congress which is immune from a defamation suit under the Speech and Debate Clause. Doesn't matter if it's true or not, the MSM will run with it and try not to cross the line into republication and getting hit with their own defamation suits.

If Larry Summers was smart, and assuming Elizabeth Warren made her comments against him outside of Congress, where she would not have immunity, like at a press conference, he should have played offense and sued her ass off.

That's what Trump would do. That's what Trump has done, and may be doing against the BBC.