Subject: Re: Why can't reps pass the CR with only 51 votes
Got my answer (I hope) :) It looks like the nominee change only required 53 votes to change a rule, whereas the change to the CR would require 60. so it isn't using the same vote count and appears to be a deceptive statement. I'm still puzzled as to why a 53 vote is the nuclear option (If AI is wrong Albabay will enjoy correcting it(me) eversomuchmoreso.

AI Overview
In September 2025, Senate Republicans used a procedural move known as the "nuclear option" to change Senate rules and speed up the confirmation of certain presidential nominees. The change allows for lower-level, non-judicial nominees to be confirmed in large groups rather than requiring a vote for each individual.

The rule change

On September 11, 2025, the Senate voted 53–45 along party lines to establish the new rule.
It specifically applies to executive branch positions that are subject to two hours of Senate debate, such as subcabinet roles and ambassadorships.
The new procedure lets the majority party consider multiple nominees "en bloc" (in a single vote), a change from the previous practice where unanimous consent was required for such group confirmations.
The rule change did not affect judicial nominations or Cabinet secretaries, which still require individual votes.

Context for the change

The move came after Republicans expressed frustration over the slow pace of confirmations, which they attributed to the minority party's use of procedural delays. The rule change was initiated after bipartisan negotiations collapsed.
Recent confirmations
Following the rule change, the Senate confirmed a group of 48 nominees via a single vote on September 18, 2025. Among those confirmed were Kimberly Guilfoyle as U.S. Ambassador to Greece and Jonathan Morrison as the administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.