Subject: Re: War ravaged Portland
This doesn't address the point: there's zero amount of evidence that folks here will accept.

That is simply not true. You haven't posted any evidence of rioting after the June 15th riot. People would accept evidence if you actually posted it, but you haven't. You have posted videos of people not rioting.

This is not moving goalposts or narrowing definitions. There have been ongoing disturbances in front of ICE, without question. There are protests and people with bullhorns in the middle of the night and folks standing in the roadway making it very difficult to access the building. But those aren't riots. Those aren't the sorts of disturbances that rise to the level of needing federal troops. They aren't 100+ days of continual rioting.

This is not a massively high standard of evidence. You haven't presented any evidence of what you claimed. You've shown videos of people not rioting, which is (obviously) not evidence of people rioting.

If you want to support your original claim - that there were 100+ consecutive days of rioting - then by all means present the evidence. If you are merely claiming that there have been "disturbances" in front of the ICE building, then no one disagrees with you. But disturbances are not the same thing as riots, and disturbances don't necessitate federal troops.