Subject: Re: war with Denmark or Panama??
Why must it be addressed?

Because we foot the lion's share of the bill, that's why. Countries are either partners or they aren't.

Why would we expect that negotiations among the interested parties must address the concerns of other nations, like the US?

You guys are all making the same mistake: you're assuming that the status quo is acceptable. It isn't, not if anyone is serious about confronting China in 2027+.